IJRME – Volume 4 Issue 1 Paper 4


Author’s Name :  Arun J Pawar | S Y Gajjal

Volume 04 Issue 01  Year 2017  ISSN No:  2349-3860  Page no: 15-17



In the event of crash, the specific structures such as bumper, crush can and front end carrier undergo plastic deformation. The frontal crash is the most dangerous situation and for which the crash energy management in frontal crumple zone of the automotive body is one of the key elements for the design of automotive structure. Thus, the design and analysis of structural behaviour of crumple zone components is of prime importance. Improving the energy absorption characteristics reduce the magnitude of the force transferred to the occupant compartment. Quasi static analysis and dynamic analysis are used for studying the crushing behaviour of the crush cans. The selection of cross sectional shape and material is very important for obtaining maximum performance of crush can. Crush cans are used as replaceable energy absorbing devices. This work is concerned with comparative study of rectangular and hexagonal crush can under quasi static axial loading. The hexagonal section crush can show better performance than rectangular section. FEA results are obtained using LS-DYNA as solver.


Specific energy absorption (SEA);Mean load,Peak load,Crush can


  1. Zonghua Zhang, Shutian and Zhiliang Tang, “Design optimization of cross-sectional configuration of rib-reinforced thin-walled beam”, Thin-Walled Structures, Elsevier, 2009, pp 868 – 878.
  2. Sanjeev Kumar, “A numerical Study on the Axial Crush Characteristics of Thin Walled Rectangular Tubes Subjected to Dynamic Impact.”, SAE Technical Paper, 2008.
  3. Omar Faruque and Nripen Saha, “Extruded Aluminium Crash Can Topology for Maximizing Specific Energy Absorption.”, SAE Technical Paper, 2008.
  4. Bryan J Stewart, Hesham Ahmed Ezzat, Marcel R. Cannon and Stephen E. Kensett, “Mass Efficient Front Crush Can Design”, SAE Technical Paper, 2011-01-0769.
  5. Jurgen Hirsch, “Aluminium in Innovative Light-Weight Car Design”, Materials Transactions, May 1 2011, Vol. 52, No 5, pp 818 – 824.
  6. Bhavesh A. Bohra and Prof. D.B Pawar, “Comparative analysis of frontal car bumper during impact”, International Journal of Innovation in Engineering & Management, December 2014, Vol 3, Issue 12, pp 88 – 93.
  7. V. Jandaghi Shahi and J. Marzbanrad, “Analytical and experimental studies on quasi-static axial crush behaviour of thin-walled tailor-made aluminum tubes”, Elsevier, Thin – walled structures 60 ,2012, pp 24-3
  8. G. Belingardi, A.T. Beyene, E.G. Koricho and B. Martorana, “Alternate lightweight materials and component manufacturing technologies for vehicle frontal bumper beam”, Elsevier, 2014, pp 483 – 495.
  9. C. Ramesh Kannan, G Rajkumar, P Padmanabhan, “Optimization of Bumper Design by Using Crash Test”, IJERT,2014, ISSN:2278-0181, Vol. 3, Issue 11.
  10. Sekhar Reddy, Milad Abbasi and Mohammad Fard, “Multi-cornered thin-walled sheet metal members for enhanced crashworthiness and occupant protection”, Thin-Walled Structures, Elsevier,2015, pp 56 – 66.
  11. M. R. Said and A.J. Chuli, “Fabrication and testing of the sheet metal tubes under quasi-static loading”, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2016, pp 5418-5426.
  12. Satish Jaju, Pritesh Jain and Gopal Musale, “Reduce Cost of Product Design using Unit FE Simulation.”, SAE Technical Paper, 2016